By Annika Hernroth-Rothstein, published in Israel Hayom October 23, 2015
As we learned this week, France is drafting a U.N. Security Council presidential statement that proposes stationing international observers on the Temple Mount to ensure the preservation of the status quo at the site. French Ambassador to the U.N. Francois Delattre said during an emergency Security Council meeting that the statement would appeal for calm and restraint, for a revival of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, and for preserving the status quo on the Temple Mount.
For this presidential statement to pass, it must gain a unanimous vote by the 15-member Security Council.
The move comes after weeks of unrest and escalating violence, including murders and terror attacks targeting Jews around Israel. The waves of terror are said to have been triggered in part by rumors in the Arab world saying that Israel plans to take control of or even destroy Al-Aqsa mosque. But such rumors have swirled around for decades, and the more probable cause is added Palestinian incitement, from the very top of Fatah to local leaders and Muslim clerics around the world.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said repeatedly that Israel has not changed and is not changing the status quo on the Temple Mount, and that rumors to the contrary are "nothing but lies."
Danny Danon, Israel's envoy to the U.N., reiterated this statement before the Security Council, where he also made it clear that Israel would never accept international forces policing the Temple Mount, as that would in itself change the status quo and do nothing to quell the violence originating from the Arab community.
Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian representative at the U.N., said he wants the council to consider deploying an international force at Al-Aqsa mosque to protect Muslim worshippers in accordance with the French suggestion, and that he sees it as within the responsibility of the U.N. to protect the Palestinian people "in occupied territory, such as East Jerusalem."
I would assume that France, in its explicit effort to "internationalize religious sites," now plans to deploy troops to Mosul, Palmyra, Fathi al-Ka'en, Tal Afar, Al-Qaryatayn and Tripoli -- just six of the many cities where Islamic State fighters have destroyed religious sites in the past few years. If the international community, spearheaded by France, now wants to protect people and religious sites, the focal point should be fighting those who come out and say that their main goal is to erase history, rather than supporting those very forces through a mad mix of hypocrisy and political ineptitude.
Speaking of hypocritical and inept, this week also saw a different push for change, namely the UNESCO resolution submitted by Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates on behalf of the Palestinian Authority, declaring that the Western Wall is part of Al-Aqsa. The text, using exclusively Muslim terms for the area and avoiding any mention of Jewish history in Jerusalem, states that UNESCO should affirm "the Buraq Plaza as being an integral part of Al-Aqsa mosque/Al-Haram al-Sharif." Needless to say, Israeli officials, including Deputy Foreign Minister Tzipi Hotovely and UNESCO Ambassador Carmel Shama Hacohen, condemned the proposal, calling it an attempt at "total Islamization" of Jewish holy sites.
There are many absurdities surrounding the UNESCO proposal, but one of the finer points is this: The assertion that the Western Wall is part of Al-Aqsa would allow Muslims to claim that thousands of Jews are "praying at Al-Aqsa." This could be portrayed as a massive violation of the status quo, though in reality it is only a continuation of a nearly 2,000 -year-old tradition...
Read more.